CMS Translation Software, Timelines & Vendor Selection
Translation software is the whole requirement in a sentence. The three reportable values do not exist in your EMR and cannot be pulled from it. They have to be calculated from DICOM image data, combined with EMR information, and written back in a CMS-ready format. If a vendor cannot describe that full round trip, they are solving part of the problem.
Receiving three numbers is not the same as being able to defend them. Ask which series, scan, and acquisition steps each value came from. Without that trail you cannot improve a score you do not like, and you cannot explain a result you have already submitted.
Only the outpatient deadline moved. OQR voluntary reporting was extended indefinitely by the CY 2026 OPPS Final Rule, but IQR still points to FY 2027 payment determination and MIPS still points to the 2027 payment year off the 2025 performance year. Read the delay as applying to one program, not to all three.
Procurement and legal will consume roughly a third of your timeline. Vendor evaluation, budget approval, legal review, and cybersecurity assessment run 5 to 10 months before a single system gets installed. Teams that start the clock at implementation are already months behind the one that actually matters.
Early access is the point of the voluntary window. Once reporting counts, you own the results. The gap between now and a mandatory date is the only chance you get to review your own data, find outliers, and fix protocols before anything is scored.
Vendor Evaluation Guide
Translation software, timelines, and vendor selection
To meet the CMS eCQM requirements, three values must be reported for every diagnostic CT exam in adults.
-
CT Category CMS-defined protocol group
-
Global Noise Level Quantified image value
-
Size-Adjusted Radiation Dose Patient-normalized metric
None of these values live in your EMR. They must be calculated from DICOM image data using what CMS refers to as translation software.
Translation software extracts image data from your radiology systems, combines it with EMR information, performs the required calculations, and transfers the results back into your EMR in a CMS-ready format.
Where things stand
Reporting timelines
| Program | Reporting period | Payment determination |
|---|---|---|
| IQR Self-selectable | CY 2025 | FY 2027 |
| MIPS Self-selectable | 2025 performance year | 2027 payment year |
| OQR Voluntary | CY 2025 onward | Extended indefinitely |
CY 2026 OPPS Final Rule update
The original CY 2027 mandatory OQR reporting date has been removed. CMS extended voluntary reporting indefinitely, citing infrastructure concerns and the need for more time to monitor implementation progress. No new mandatory date has been set. CMS remains committed to the measure as a patient safety issue for cancer prevention.
Evaluation criteria
What to look for in translation software
Clarity behind the numbers
It is not enough to simply receive three values. You also need to know how they were derived, including which series, scan, and acquisition steps they came from. Without that, there is no way to improve performance or defend what was submitted.
Immediate visibility into your data
Do not wait until reporting is required. Early visibility lets you identify and correct issues before they affect your scores.
Seamless integration with your environment
The right software connects with your existing scanners, PACS, and EMR without starting from scratch. This reduces implementation time and minimizes operational disruption, which alone can save many months.
Cloud-based convenience
On-premises models add IT complexity and restrict flexibility. A modern cloud-based approach reduces the installation burden and provides easier access for stakeholders across your organization.
Benchmarking
The ability to compare your eCQM performance against other facilities helps you understand whether your results are typical or point to areas needing improvement.
Because you do not want to be reporting data you have not seen.
Once reporting begins, you are accountable for the results. Early access gives you time to review your data, identify outliers, refine protocols, and avoid performance penalties.
Due diligence
Questions to ask potential vendors
If your organization is evaluating software solutions for CMS reporting, assess each vendor’s ability to meet your requirements before you commit. These questions surface experience, service quality, and whether the software can adapt as the regulation evolves.
- What is the history and track record of your company?
- How many hospitals currently use your software?
- How many of your active clients are willing to vouch for your implementation experience and ongoing support?
- What level of expertise does your team have with the CMS ExRAD eCQM specifications?
- How frequently do you release software updates, and what does that process look like for your customers?
- What are your fees for ongoing support and training services?
- How do you structure pricing for new features, especially those critical for maintaining future compliance?
Plan accordingly
Plan for an 18-month implementation window
Do not underestimate the time required to go from vendor selection to validated reporting.
- Vendor evaluation and selection (2 to 3 months)
- Budget approval and procurement (2 to 4 months)
- Legal review, BAA, and cybersecurity assessment (1 to 3 months)
- Installation and EMR integration (3 to 4 months)
- Data validation and internal testing (2 to 3 months)
- Protocol review, outlier investigation, and optimization (2 to 3 months)
- Voluntary reporting and ongoing monitoring (Ongoing)
Questions from This Article
- Can our EMR vendor handle this?
Not on its own. The measure runs on image-level data that requires calculation from DICOM, which is outside what EMR systems do. Your EMR is the destination for the finished values, not the source. Expect to need a separate platform that can perform the calculations and hand results back to the EMR cleanly.
- Does CMS certify or require a particular vendor?
No. CMS confirmed that hospitals may use any vendor’s translation software that meets the measure specifications. There is no certification program. Treat any claim of being the approved or certified option with skepticism, and evaluate on demonstrated capability instead.
- If OQR reporting was extended indefinitely, can we push this to next year's budget?
That depends on how much of the timeline you are willing to compress later. An 18-month path from vendor selection to validated reporting means a budget cycle skipped now moves your readiness date well past any deadline CMS is likely to set on short notice. It also gives up the one advantage of the voluntary period, which is seeing your own numbers before they count against you. IQR and MIPS timelines have not moved either.
More Articles You'll Find Useful
All Articles
CMS Clarifies eCQM Compliance: Hospitals Have a Choice
Demystifying “Translation Software” in Healthcare Imaging: A Perspective from Imalogix
CMS ExRAD eCQM: Regulatory History and Current Status